Skip Navigation Linkswww.weather.gov 
NOAA logo - Click to go to the NOAA homepage National Weather Service Forecast Office   NWS logo - Click to go to the NWS homepage
WFO Greenville-Spartanburg, SC
 

Local forecast by
"City, St"
  

The Good Friday Severe Weather Outbreak

of April 10, 2009.

Justin D. Lane and Patrick D. Moore
NOAA/National Weather Service
Greer, SC

Aerial view of the tornado path near Townville, Anderson County, South Carolina.  Image courtesy of Anderson County Emergency Management

Aerial view of the tornado damage near Double Springs and Townville, South Carolina, on 10 April 2009. Image courtesy of Anderson County Emergency Management.

Author's Note: The following report has not been subjected to the scientific peer review process.

1.  Introduction
A series of supercell thunderstorms moved across the upper Savannah 
River Valley during the afternoon of 10 April 2009, spawning as many 
as four tornadoes across extreme northeast Georgia and the western 
portions of Upstate South Carolina.  The first tornado touched down 
at 130 pm Eastern Daylight Time (or 1730 Universal Time Coordinated 
[UTC]) about one mile west of Long Creek, South Carolina, just 
over the Georgia state line in western Oconee County.  [Note:  All
times in this document are referenced to UTC.  To convert to Eastern
Daylight Time, subtract four hours from the UTC time.)  The tornado 
path was only one-tenth of a mile long and damage was rated at EF0 
on the Enhanced Fujita Scale.  Shortly thereafter, a more powerful 
tornado tracked across northern Franklin County, Georgia, beginning 
at 1753 UTC about one mile west of the Red Hill community.  This 
tornado produced damage rated up to EF2 as it moved about 9.5 miles 
and lifted two miles north northwest of Lavonia at 1806 UTC.  The 
supercell responsible for the Franklin County tornado continued east 
and produced another tornado over western Anderson County, South 
Carolina, about six miles south of Townville, beginning at 1823 UTC.  
The tornado moved across the Lake Hartwell area on a path nearly three 
miles long and caused damage rated at EF1 intensity before lifting at 
1827 UTC.  Another weaker tornado touched down in eastern Anderson 
County at 1853 UTC near Highway 29 and the Jockey Lot.
As the supercells moved into central portions of the Upstate, an 
evolution to a linear mesoscale convective system (MCS)/bow echo regime 
was observed in the early part of the evening.  This resulted in a 
perceived transition in the severe weather threat from tornadoes and 
hail to damaging downburst winds.  However, at least five more tornadoes 
developed in association with bow echoes.  Two of them tracked across 
Abbeville County, South Carolina:  one in a rural area three miles 
northwest of the Watts community (an EF1), and the other across the 
city of Abbeville (an EF2).  At the same time, another tornado (EF1) 
was on the ground near Jonesville, South Carolina.  The final two 
tornadoes occurred a short while later on the north and south side 
of Greenwood, South Carolina.  Another intermittent path of wind 
damage also occurred to the south of Monroe, North Carolina, but was 
determined to be non-tornadic.
Severe thunderstorm and tornado reports for 10 April 2009
Figure 1.  Storm Prediction Center (SPC) storm reports for 10 April 2009. 
Tornado reports are in red. Large hail reports are in green.  Damaging 
straight-line wind reports are in blue.  Black squares represent reports 
of wind gusts of 65 knots or greater.  Black triangles are reports of 
hail 2 inches in diameter or larger.
The forecasters at the National Weather Service (NWS) Forecast Office in 
Greer, South Carolina, anticipated an outbreak of severe thunderstorms
on 10 April 2009.  The potential for supercells and tornadoes was also
recognized by the Storm Prediction Center (SPC) in the Day 1 Convective
Outlook issued at 0559 UTC, which placed northeast Georgia and the 
western Carolinas in a moderate risk.  In fact, the SPC even issued a
Public Severe Weather Outlook for the region to highlight the increased
danger for significant tornadoes.
2.  Synoptic Characteristics
A closed upper low was located over southern Missouri at 500 mb at 
1200 UTC on 10 April (Fig. 2).  An associated negatively tilted trough 
axis extended from the low through eastern Arkansas into Mississippi.  
This resulted in moderately strong and diffluent flow across much of 
the Tennessee Valley and southern Appalachians.  The 300 hPa analysis 
at 1200 UTC (Fig. 3) revealed the upper tropospheric reflection of the 
Mississippi Valley low, with a jet maximum moving through the trough 
axis.  Rather strong upper level divergence occurred across the 
Tennessee Valley in association with the left exit region of this jet 
streak, although it is possible the divergence may have been augmented 
by the right entrance region of a second jet maximum across the 
northeast United States.  The analysis also revealed the vertical 
depth of the diffluent flow pattern over the Tennessee Valley/Southern 
Appalachian area.
500 mb analysis at 1200 UTC on 10 April
Figure 2.  SPC objective analysis of 500 mb geopotential height, 
temperature and wind at 1200 UTC on 10 April.  Click on image to enlarge.
300 mb analysis at 1200 UTC on 10 April 2009
Figure 3.  SPC objective analysis of 300 mb isotachs, streamlines, wind
barbs, and divergence at 1200 UTC on 10 April.  Click on image to 
enlarge.
The upper air sounding from Peachtree City, Georgia (FFC), at 1200 UTC 
on 10 April revealed a relatively cool and moist boundary layer (Fig. 4). 
Despite the early hour, the near-surface environment was relatively 
well-mixed, due to low-level cloud cover and light southeast surface flow. 
A shallow temperature inversion was observed between 875 mb and 830 mb. 
Above this inversion, a shallow layer of very steep lapse rates extended 
to near the 750 mb level.  This layer played a key role in the evolution 
of convection later in the afternoon across north Georgia and Upstate 
South Carolina.
Upper air observation at FFC at 1200 UTC on 10 April
Figure 4.  Skew-T, log P diagram and wind profile for observed sounding 
from FFC at 1200 UTC on 10 April.  The temperature sounding is shown by 
the red line and the dewpoint sounding is shown by the dashed green line.  
A hodograph is provided in the upper left corner.  Click on image to 
enlarge.
Lapse rates diminished in magnitude above the shallow, elevated mixed 
layer.  Surface-based air parcels possessed no potential instability at 
1200 UTC due to the cool boundary layer and modest mid-level lapse rates,  
but wind profiles were quite strong.  The flow veered and increased from 
the surface through 940 mb, with weak veering and strengthening of the 
flow observed through the remainder of the troposphere.  The sounding 
yielded shear of 23 m s-1 in the 0-3 km layer and 28 m s-1 in the 0-6 km 
layer, values that were more than adequate for organized storms, 
including supercells.  Storm relative helicity (SRH) values were 
supportive of rotating updrafts, with SRH exceeding 250 m2 s-2 in the 
0-1 km and 0-3 km layers.
The temperature structure in the 875 mb to 750 mb layer in the FFC 
sounding was a remnant of the elevated mixed layer originating from 
the high plateau of northern Mexico.  The air parcel trajectory analysis 
in Fig. 5 confirmed the origin of this layer.  The role of the elevated 
mixed layer in severe weather outbreaks across the Great Plains and 
Mississippi Valley is well-established.  However, it has also been 
discussed in previous analyses of severe weather outbreaks across the 
western Carolinas and northeast Georgia (Lane, 2008).
Backward trajectory from HYSPLIT ending at 1200 UTC on 10 April 2009
Figure 5.  Air parcel trajectory analysis from the National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Air Resources Lab (ARL) HYSPLIT model. 
For this analysis, the GDAS model was run backwards for 96 hours from 
10 April 2009 at 1200 UTC.  Traces show the origin of air parcels at FFC 
at the 1000 m (red), 2000 m (blue), and 3000 m (green) levels.
At the surface, north Georgia and the Carolinas were located within the 
warm sector of the low pressure system located over southeast Missouri
at 1200 UTC (Fig. 6).  A regional surface plot at this time (Fig. 7) 
indicated air temperatures in the 50s (degrees F) across much of the 
southeast, while dewpoint temperatures ranged from the 40s across the 
western Carolinas to the lower 60s near the coasts.
HPC Surface fronts and pressure analysis at 1200 UTC 10 April
Figure 6.  HPC surface fronts and pressure analysis at 1200 UTC on 
10 April.  Click on image to enlarge.
Surface observations at 1200 UTC on 10 April
Figure 7.  Surface observations at 1200 UTC on 10 April.  Observations 
are plotted using the traditional station model.  Click on image to 
enlarge.
Another regional plot at 1700 UTC (Fig. 8) revealed how diurnal heating 
and strong southerly flow affected the low level environment through the 
morning and early afternoon hours.  Air temperatures warmed to the 70s 
while mixing resulted in an increase in southerly surface winds to 10 
to 20 kt across much of the region.  However, a small area of the western 
Carolinas and northeast Georgia had light and variable winds and air 
temperatures in the upper 50s and lower 60s.  This was attributed to 
weak cold air damming (CAD) that developed in response to stratiform 
rain falling into the relatively cool and dry airmass that was in place 
across this area during the morning.  Although the main synoptic-scale 
frontal boundaries remained well west and north of the region, the CAD 
established a mesoscale differential heating boundary that extended from 
the central Piedmont of North Carolina, across northern South Carolina, 
into north Georgia.  Fairly strong low-level speed convergence can be 
inferred along this boundary across the Upper Savannah River Valley.
Surface observations at 1700 UTC on 10 April
Figure 8.  Surface observations plot at 1700 UTC on 10 April.  Click on 
image to enlarge.
A special upper air observation from FFC taken at 1800 UTC revealed 
that the structure of the lower atmosphere changed significantly since 
1200 UTC (Fig. 9).  The combination of heating and large scale upward 
vertical motion (UVM) beneath the diffluent/divergent upper tropospheric 
flow resulted in lifting and removal of the low-level inversion seen in 
Fig. 4.  Meanwhile, mid-tropospheric cold advection associated with the 
upper low and dynamic cooling from UVM resulted in a layer of steep lapse 
rates between the 720 mb and 600 mb layer.  This combination of low-level 
warm and moist advection, diurnal heating, and steep mid-level lapse 
rates produced convective available potential energy (CAPE) values in 
excess of 1300 J kg-1. This was similar to levels of instability 
associated with previous outbreaks of tornadic supercells across north 
Georgia and the western Carolinas (Lane, 2008).
Upper air observation at FFC at 1800 UTC on 10 April
Figure 9.  As in Fig. 4, except at 1800 UTC.  Click on image to enlarge.
Although mid-tropospheric wind fields strengthened considerably since 
1200 UTC, the magnitude of the 0-3 km shear actually diminished to 
18 m s-1 due to veering of the surface wind.  Meanwhile, the strengthening 
flow resulted in intensification of the 0-6 km shear to 37 m s-1.  Values
of SRH remained more than adequate for rotating updrafts, exceeding 
200 m2s-2 in both the 0-1 km and 0-3 km layers.  Clearly, the 
combination of instability and shear parameters was supportive of 
supercells.  The potential for isolated tornadoes also existed, 
particularly from updrafts interacting with the differential heating 
boundary.
3.  Mesoscale Convective Evolution
A band of convection moved from the Tennessee Valley into extreme 
western North Carolina around daybreak on 10 April.  At 1200 UTC, the 
leading edge of the convective band stretched from metro Atlanta, 
northward across the western tip of North Carolina, to Morristown,
Tennessee (Fig. 10).  The line of storms had a history of producing
damaging wind gusts and hail as it moved through north Alabama and
south central Tennessee but was moving into a less favorable air mass,
so additional severe weather potential was thought to be isolated.  
Although some of the embedded thunderstorms were strong, no severe 
weather was reported with the convection as it moved across east 
Tennessee and western North Carolina.  The band weakened throughout 
the morning as it moved across the stable air mass in place across 
the western Carolinas.
Click here to view a 9 frame loop of a composite reflectivity mosaic 
from 0900 UTC to 1700 UTC on 10 April.
Composite reflectivity mosaic at 1200 UTC on 10 April 2009
Figure 10.  Regional composite radar reflectivity mosaic at 1200 UTC on 
10 April 2009.  Click on image to enlarge.
By 1800 UTC, the remnants of the first band of convection extended from 
the western Piedmont of North Carolina into northern portions of Upstate 
South Carolina and extreme northeast Georgia (Fig. 11).  Although the 
band of convection had decreased in intensity from 1200 UTC, on the 
larger scale, isolated strong to severe storms were producing marginally 
severe hail across northeast Georgia around this time.  The SPC mesoscale 
objective analysis of surface-based CAPE (SBCAPE) at 1800 UTC (Fig. 12) 
suggested that the convection was elevated, as instability remained 
non-existent for surface-based air parcels.  Meanwhile, another band of 
convection, with some embedded intense updrafts, was moving across middle 
Tennessee and extreme northern Alabama in association with the cold front.  
This convection continued to develop into mostly discrete supercells 
through the early part of the afternoon, which heightened the severe 
weather threat for north Georgia.  This prompted the issuance of a 
Tornado Watch (#134) at 1940 UTC for a large area that included far 
western North Carolina and northeast Georgia.  The situation was thought 
to be particularly dangerous with the potential for long track tornadoes.
Composite reflectivity mosaic at 1758 UTC on 10 April 2009
Figure 11.  Regional composite radar reflectivity mosaic at 1758 UTC on 
10 April 2009.  Click on image to enlarge.
SBCAPE, SBCIN, and wind at 1800 UTC on 10 April 2009
Figure 12.  SPC mesoscale objective analysis of surface-based CAPE (solid
brown contours), surface-based convective inhibition (SBCIN, color fill), 
and surface wind (barbs) at 1800 UTC on 10 April 2009.  Click on image 
to enlarge.
Throughout the afternoon, the differential heating boundary lifted 
gradually north, as shown by an analysis of SBCAPE at 2200 UTC (Fig. 13).  
Marginally unstable air, with CAPE values exceeding 500 J kg-1, was moving 
into extreme northeast Georgia and the lower Piedmont of South Carolina 
at this time.
SBCAPE, SBCIN, and wind at 2200 UTC on 10 April 2009
Figure 13.  As in Fig. 12, except for 2200 UTC.  Click on image to 
enlarge.
As the northern portion of the convective band moved into the more 
stable air mass across western North Carolina, significant weakening 
of convection was observed (Fig. 14).  However, the southern part of 
the band remained vigorous, with a well-defined mesoscale convective 
system (MCS) with bowing reflectivity structures (hereafter referred to 
as BOW1) moving across north Georgia.  Meanwhile, isolated discrete 
cells were forming along the leading edge of the convective band across 
extreme northeast Georgia.  The environment ahead of the supercells
was expected to become increasingly favorable for their maintenance
through the early part of the evening.  Thus, another Tornado Watch 
(#135) was issued for Upstate South Carolina at 2231 UTC.
Composite reflectivity mosaic at 2159 UTC on 10 April 2009
Figure 14.  As in Fig. 10, except for 2159 UTC on 10 April 2009.  The 
locations of bow echo 1, supercell 1, and supercell 2 are indicated.  
Click on image to enlarge.
4.  Storm Scale Convective Evolution 
Around 2230 UTC, two intense, discrete convective cells were seen 
on the NWS Doppler radar at the Greenville - Spartanburg International
Airport (the KGSP radar).  One of the thunderstorms was located over
northern Banks County, Georgia, and the other straddled the border 
between Rabun County, Georgia, and Oconee County, South Carolina 
(Fig. 15).  Both cells exhibited supercellular characteristics, with 
hook echoes, forward flank inflow notches, moderate to strong 
mesocyclones, and weak echo regions.
KGSP composite reflectivity at 2229 UTC on 10 April 2009
Figure 15.  KGSP composite reflectivity at 2229 UTC on 10 April.  The 
color table on the right shows the reflectivity values.  Supercells SC1 
and SC2 are labelled.  Click on image to enlarge.
Despite its impressive structure, large hail up to 4 cm in diameter 
was the only severe weather reported with the northern supercell (SC1). 
Examination of Fig. 13, in conjunction with a regional surface plot from 
2200 UTC (Fig. 16) provided clues to the absence of tornadoes and 
damaging winds in association with SC1.  These images revealed that SC1 
was located 50-60 km north of the differential heating boundary, far 
into the cool air mass associated with weak CAD.  In fact, air 
temperatures in this area remained in the upper 50s (degrees F).  This 
suggested there was no SBCAPE available to convective updrafts (as 
confirmed by the SBCAPE analysis in Fig. 13) indicating that the 
mesocyclonic circulation and any negatively buoyant air were likely to 
remain aloft.
Surface analysis at 2200 UTC on 10 April
Figure 16.  Regional surface analysis at 2200 UTC on 10 April.  The 
red line denotes the differential heating boundary associated with
weak cold air damming.
a. The Franklin County Tornado
Of greater concern was the southern supercell (SC2) in Fig. 15, as this 
cell was located very close to the surface boundary.  As seen in Fig. 13, 
marginal to moderate values of SBCAPE were slowly spreading northward 
along the boundary.  The KGSP volume scan at 2249 UTC revealed the 
low-level hook echo and the location of the weak echo region along the 
border between Stephens County and Franklin County, Georgia (Fig. 17).
The Storm Relative Velocity (SRV) images from this time (Fig. 18) showed 
the deep, persistent mesocyclone associated with SC2.  Rotational 
velocity (Vr) of 35 kt or greater extended from about 10,000 ft through 
the 20,000 ft level of this storm.  This was well within the moderate 
mesocyclone category of the mesocyclone detection nomogram.  Although 
the rotation weakened in the lowest elevation scans, there was a broad 
shear axis at the 0.5 degree scan.  Severe weather occurrence was 
limited to large hail in excess of 4 cm at this point.
KGSP base reflectivity at 2249 UTC on 10 April 2009
Figure 17.  KGSP base reflectivity on the (A) 0.5 degree, (B) 1.5 degree, 
(C) 2.4 degree, and (D) 3.1 degree elevation scans at 2249 UTC on 10 April.  
The color table is shown in the upper left corner.  Click on image to 
enlarge.
KGSP storm relative velocity at 2249 UTC on 10 April 2009
Figure 18.  KGSP storm relative velocity on the (A) 0.5 degree, 
(B) 1.5 degree, (C) 2.4 degree, and (D) 3.1 degree elevation scans at 
2249 UTC on 10 April.  The color table is shown in the upper left corner.  
Click on image to enlarge.
Imagery from KGSP at 2258 UTC (Fig. 19) revealed the presence of a 
rapidly intensifying vortex beneath the mid-level mesoscyclone.  Maximum 
inbound velocity near the hook echo was 90 kt, while the maximum 
outbound velocity was 50 kt.  However, the maxima were not gate-to-gate. 
Nevertheless, a gate-to-gate shear of 90 kt was present and displaced 
just to the southwest of the maximum inbound velocity.  Rotational shear 
associated with this velocity couplet was 64.5 x 10-3 s-1, which is 
off the chart of the rotational shear nomogram, indicating a tornado 
was probable.  At the time of this image, an EF2 tornado was in 
progress across northern Franklin County (Fig. 20).
KGSP storm relative velocity and base reflectivity at 2258 UTC on 10 April 2009
Figure 19.  KGSP scan at 0.5 degree elevation of (A) base reflectivity, 
(B) storm relative velocity, and 1.3 degree elevation of (C) base
reflectivity and (D) storm relative velocity at 2258 UTC on 10 April.  
The color table is shown in the upper left corner.  Click on image to 
enlarge.
Track of damage associated with Franklin County (GA) tornado on 10 April 2009
Figure 20.  Track of the Franklin County, Georgia, tornado of 10 April 
2009, shown by the solid black line.  The tornado began at 2253 UTC
and lifted at 2306 UTC.  The map scale is shown in the lower left.  
Click on image to enlarge.
A storm damage survey indicated the tornado lifted before SC2 crossed 
the South Carolina border.
b. The Anderson County Tornado
Another tornado developed over western Anderson County, South Carolina,
after 2300 UTC.  A series of images from KGSP at 2327 UTC showed many
supercell characteristics during the time of tornado occurrence over 
Anderson County (Fig. 21).  The hook echo remained evident in 
reflectivity imagery.  There was also a rather strong, broad convergent 
rotational signature at the 0.5 degree elevation scan, indicating the 
mesocyclone now extended to the lowest levels of SC2.  Outbound 
velocities on the north side of this vortex were very strong, with a 
maximum of 61 kt.  Inbound velocity peaked at 28 kt (Vr of 44 kt, 
indicating a strong mesocyclone).  Embedded within the broader 
mesocyclonic vortex was a moderately strong gate-to-gate shear of 68 kt. 
The rotational shear associated with this couplet was 45.4 x 10-3 s-1. 
Although not as strong as the Franklin County signature, this value 
also indicated a probable tornado.  A short-track, strong EF1 tornado 
moved across extreme western Anderson County during this time (Fig. 22).
KGSP storm relative velocity and base reflectivity at 2327 UTC on 10 April 2009
Figure 21.  As in Fig. 19, except for 2327 UTC.  Click on image to 
enlarge.
Track of damage associated with Anderson County (SC) tornado on 10 April 2009
Figure 22.  Track of the Anderson County, South Carolina, tornado of 
10 April 2009, shown by the solid black line.  The tornado began at 
2323 UTC and lifted at 2327 UTC.  The map scale is shown in the lower 
left.  Click on image to enlarge.
As SC2 moved across Anderson County, SC1 made a transition in convective 
mode across Pickens County.  The environment more favorable for 
supercells was shifting farther to the south after 2300 UTC.  At 2306 UTC, 
supercell characteristics continued to be observed with SC1, as a hook 
echo was still seen in the reflectivity field (Fig. 23).  The SRV 
indicated weak, convergent cyclonic shear in association with the hook.  
However, after 2306 UTC, the rear flank gust front began to surge ahead 
of the hook, cutting off the inflow into the right flank of the storm. 
The result of this evolution was seen in the images from KGSP at 2340 UTC 
(Fig. 24).  The reflectivity structure became more elongated.  Meanwhile, 
the SRV indicated the velocity structure of this cell was no longer 
dominated by cyclonic shear, but rather by a purely convergent signature 
along the leading edge of the cell, with divergence indicated just upshear 
of the convergence.  In other words, the cell transitioned to an outflow-
dominant bow echo as it crossed into Greenville County.  At 2345 UTC, a 
significant downburst event was underway across the west side of the city 
of Greenville, knocking down dozens of trees.  It was somewhat surprising 
that a strong downburst was able to translate to the surface this far 
north of the differential heating boundary, especially considering the 
fact that wind damage was very sporadic as the fully-mature bow echo moved 
across the remainder of Greenville County, then into Spartanburg County.  
Surface observations continued to indicate air temperatures in the 50s 
(degrees F) across northern portions of Upstate South Carolina between 
2300 UTC and 0000 UTC while SPC mesoanalysis indicated no SBCAPE that far 
north.  It is speculated that a local weakness in the low-level temperature 
inversion was present, and that negatively buoyant air possessed sufficient 
momentum to penetrate this inversion and impact the surface.
KGSP storm relative velocity and base reflectivity at 2306 UTC on 10 April 2009
Figure 23.  KGSP scan at 0.5 degree elevation of (A) base reflectivity, 
and (B) storm relative velocity at 2306 UTC on 10 April.  The color 
table is shown in the upper left corner.  Click on image to enlarge.
KGSP storm relative velocity and base reflectivity at 2340 UTC on 10 April 2009
Figure 24.  As in Fig. 23, except for 2340 UTC on 10 April.  Click on 
image to enlarge.
c. The Jonesville Tornado
From 2355 UTC on 10 April to 0020 UTC on 11 April, the well-developed 
bow echo moved east across the southern half of Spartanburg County.  
As the bow echo was poised to move out of Spartanburg County and into 
Union County, South Carolina, a large area of outbound radial velocity 
with some values greater than 50 kt at approximately 1000 feet AGL was 
noted on the 0.5 degree scan from the KGSP radar (Fig. 25).  Based upon 
the radar presentation and a history of wind damage, a Severe Thunderstorm 
Warning was issued for Union County at 0023 UTC on 11 April.
KGSP base velocity 0.5 degree scan at 0022 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 25.  KGSP base velocity on the 0.5 degree scan at 0022 UTC on 
11 April.  The warmer colors represent motion away from the radar and
the cooler colors show motion toward the radar, as given by the color
table on the right.  Click on image to enlarge.
The KGSP radar identified a mesocyclone on the 0022 UTC volume scan on 
the leading edge of the bow echo, although it was difficult to discern 
a coherent rotational couplet at that time.  The 0026 UTC volume scan 
also contained little information to suggest a tornado was forming, 
other than broad, cyclonically-convergent rotation on the 1.3 degree 
to 3.1 degree scans (Fig. 26) on the northern flank of the advancing 
bow echo.   Values for rotational velocity (Fig. 27) and rotational 
shear (Fig. 28) were similar to previous volume scans with no 
significant trends noted.
KGSP storm relative motion at 0026 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 26.  KGSP storm relative motion on the (a) 0.5 degree, (b) 1.3 
degree, (c) 2.4 degree, and (d) 3.1 degree elevation scans from the 
0026 UTC volume scan on 11 April.  Warmer colors represent motion away 
from the radar and the cooler colors show motion toward the radar, as 
given by the color table in the middle.  Click on image to enlarge.
Rotational velocity calculated from the KGSP radar for the Jonesville storm,  0022 UTC to 0043 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 27.  Rotational velocity on the lowest six elevation scans from 
the KGSP radar for the period 0022 UTC to 0043 UTC on 11 April.  The 
pink colored region represents the time the tornado was on the ground. 
Click on image to enlarge.
Rotational shear calculated from the KGSP radar for the Jonesville storm,  0022 UTC to 0043 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 28.  As in Fig. 27, except for rotational shear. 
Click on image to enlarge.
With the benefit of hindsight, one can usually identify subtle radar 
signatures prior to an event that might be considered precursors, and 
this case is no different.  A northward moving boundary can be inferred 
at 0026 UTC from a line of slightly higher reflectivity on the 
0.5 degree scan (Fig. 29) extending from southeast to northwest across 
Union County and intersecting the convective line over extreme eastern 
Spartanburg County.  This might have allowed slightly more unstable air 
to advect ahead of the advancing bow echo over Union County.  A 
reflectivity cross-section along the direction of storm motion showed 
a large echo overhang (Fig. 30), which was even more apparent when 
viewing a 48 dBZ reflectivity surface generated from the 0026 UTC 
volume scan (Fig. 31).  Although some of the forward tilt might be 
an artifact of the rapid eastward movement of the storm, the echo 
overhang suggested a forward-tilting updraft and a weak echo region.
KGSP 0.5 degree base reflectivity at 0026 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 29.  KGSP base reflectivity from the 0.5 degree elevation scan 
at 0026 UTC on 11 April.  The leading edge of the bow echo is indicated 
as a cold front and the northward moving boundary is indicated as a warm 
front.  The white line shows the location of the reflectivity cross 
section in Fig. 30.  Click on image to enlarge.
KGSP reflectivity cross section at 0026 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 30.  Vertical cross section of reflectivity from the KGSP radar 
at 0026 UTC on 11 April.  The location of the cross section is shown by 
the white line in Fig. 29.  Click on image to enlarge.
KGSP 48 dBZ reflectivity surface at 0026 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 31.  KGSP radar 48 dBZ reflectivity surface at 0026 UTC on 
11 April.  The view is to the north normal to the direction of storm 
motion.  Click on image to enlarge.
Although increases in rotational velocity and shear can be considered 
only modest at best in the scans leading up to tornadogenesis, between 
0022 UTC and 0026 UTC a subtle transition from cyclonic convergence 
toward something closer to pure rotation can be inferred from the storm 
relative motion on the 2.4 degree and 3.1 degree scans (Fig. 32).  On 
those scans, the radar beam cut through the bow echo between 6500 feet 
and 8200 feet.  The developing rotation at that level was displaced 
down-shear from the strong convergence observed on the 0.5 degree scan, 
shown by the black "X" on Fig. 26.
KGSP storm relative motion at 0022 UTC and 0026 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 32.  KGSP storm relative motion on the 2.4 degree elevation scan 
at (a) 0022 UTC and (b) 0026 UTC, and on the 3.1 degree elevation scan 
at (c) 0022 UTC and (d) 0026 UTC on 11 April.  The color scale is given
in the center of the figure.  Click on image to enlarge.
A rapidly-tightening rotational couplet was observed on the 1.3 degree 
and 2.4 degree scans at 0031 UTC (Fig. 33).  Although no significant 
increase in maximum rotational velocity (Fig. 27) was seen on any scan 
up to 0031 UTC, the rotational shear (Fig. 28) increased dramatically 
on the 1.3 degree and 1.8 degree scans at that time.  The rotational 
shear more than doubled on the 1.3 degree scan to a value of 0.047 s-1, 
which was well within the "tornado likely" region of the rotational 
shear nomogram for a storm located 25 nm from the radar.  This 
information arrived too late to effectively upgrade Union County to a 
Tornado Warning as the tornado touched down at 0032 UTC.
KGSP storm relative motion at 0031 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 33.  As in Fig. 26, except for 0031 UTC on 11 April.  Click on 
image to enlarge.
The tornado was already on the ground at 0035 UTC (Fig. 34) when the 
KGSP radar clearly indicated the presence of the tornado to the south of 
Jonesville (Fig. 35).  A gate-to-gate couplet with a rotational velocity 
of 54 kt was seen on the two lowest elevation cuts.  Rotational shear 
was well off the chart.
Track of damage associated with the Jonesville, SC tornado on 10 April 2009
Figure 34.  Approximate track of the Jonesville tornado from 0032 UTC 
to 0038 UTC on 11 April.  The tornado first touched down near Zig Zag 
Road and Proctor Road and lifted near the MIlliken plant on Bob Little 
Road.  Click on image to enlarge.
KGSP storm relative motion 0.5 degree scan at 0035 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 35.  KGSP storm relative motion on the 0.5 degree elevation scan 
at 0035 UTC on 11 April.  Click on image to enlarge.
The bow echo surged forward at low levels over west-central Union County 
between 0026 UTC and 0035 UTC, which could be seen in the base velocity 
as a bulge in outbound radial velocity (Fig. 36).  The forward surge 
deformed the bow echo to the north of its apex with a rotational couplet 
(which was in fact a mesovortex) located at an inflection point on the 
bow (Fig. 37).  That the bow echo had the appearance of the familiar 
"S-shape" seen in cool season high shear, low instability environments 
may be more than mere coincidence.  The surge was probably caused by a 
rear inflow jet, manifested by the channel of lower reflectivity wrapping 
in from behind the bow echo which appeared in 44 dBZ reflectivity surfaces 
(not shown).  The rear inflow jet dessicated the higher reflectivity at 
low levels between 0026 UTC and 0039 UTC which suggested descent.  The 
weak echo channel wrapped around the position of the rotation seen at 
6000 to 8000 feet AGL minutes before the tornado touched down.  The 
descending rear inflow jet may have induced cyclonic vorticity at low 
levels to the north of its core and underneath the rotation seen on the 
2.4 degree and 3.1 degree scans.  This would provide a means for 
extending a tornadic vortex down to the surface.
KGSP base velocity from 0026 UTC to 0039 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 36.  KGSP base velocity on the 0.5 degree elevation scan at 
(a) 0026 UTC, (b) 0031 UTC, (c) 0035 UTC, and (d) 0039 UTC on 11 April.  
Red shades represent motion away from the radar and green shades show 
motion toward the radar.  Click on image to enlarge.
Progression of bow echo across Union County, SC on 10 April
Figure 37.  Position of leading edge of bow echo observed in 0.5 degree 
radial velocity in KGSP radar data from 0026 UTC to 0039 UTC on 11 April.  
The location of the mesovortex is shown by the green line.
As quickly as the rotation appeared on KGSP, it diminished by 0039 UTC 
as the tornado had already lifted.  No further damage was reported in 
Union County, although the storm continued to produce wind damage across
parts of York County and Chester County.
d. The Abbeville Tornado
Meanwhile, a bow echo (BOW1 in Fig. 14) continued to intensify as it 
moved across north Georgia and the lower piedmont of South Carolina 
during the early evening.  Because this area was south of the 
differential heating boundary, at least marginal SBCAPE was present, 
and there was no question about negatively buoyant air reaching the 
surface.  Indeed, downburst damage was fairly widespread as this bow 
echo moved across Elbert County, Georgia, and western portions of 
Abbeville County, South Carolina.  A brief tornado was spawned over 
western Abbeville County along Old Calhoun Falls Road near the 
community of Watts between 0023 UTC and 0025 UTC. 
The well-organized MCS/bow echo was located over central Abbeville 
County at 0026 UTC on 11 April (Fig. 38).  The SRV revealed an 
elongated axis of cyclonic shear along the leading edge of the higher 
reflectivity.  However, this shear evolved into a broad area of 
rotation associated with a forward flank inflow notch just north of 
the bowing segment.  Vertical analysis of the velocity structure 
indicated this was not a mesocyclone, since the rotation weakened 
with height, but was more likely the bookend vortex associated with 
a mature bow echo.  With time, this circulation would intensify.  In 
fact, at 0035 UTC a gate-to-gate shear couplet of 74 kt was evident 
just north of the apex of the bowing segment (Fig. 39).  The 
rotational shear associated with this vortex was 55.2 x10-3 s-1, 
well within the "tornado probable" category of the rotational shear
nomogram.  Around the time of this image, an EF2 tornado caused 
extensive damage across the city of Abbeville (Fig. 40). 
KGSP storm relative velocity and base reflectivity at 0026 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 38.  As in Fig. 23, except for 0026 UTC on 11 April.  Click on 
image to enlarge.
KGSP storm relative velocity and base reflectivity at 0035 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 39.  As in Fig. 23, except for 0035 UTC on 11 April.  Click on 
image to enlarge.
Track of damage associated with Abbeville (SC) tornado on 10 April 2009
Figure 40.  Track of the Abbeville, South Carolina, tornado of 
10 April 2009, shown by the solid black line.  The tornado touched down
at 0028 UTC and lifted at 0036 UTC on 11 April. The map scale is shown 
in the lower left.  Click on image to enlarge.
Despite the non-supercell nature of the Abbeville storm, a successful 
Tornado Warning (TOR), with about 15 minutes of lead time was issued 
for this event, based partly upon the rotation associated with the 
bookend vortex, but also upon environmental considerations.  This 
storm was clearly located on the warm side of the differential 
heating boundary, and was therefore surface-based.  Concerns about the 
potential of the parent updraft to tilt and stretch baroclinically 
generated horizontal vorticity in the vicinity of the surface boundary 
prompted TOR issuance.
e. The Greenwood Tornadoes
The bow echo that produced the Abbeville tornado continued to move
quickly east and into Greenwood County, South Carolina, after 0045 UTC.

The final two tornadoes of the event spun up on the leading edge of the 
QLCS as it moved across the city of Greenwood around 0048 UTC (Fig. 41).
The first tornado touched down west of Greenwood and traveled east-
southeast across the southern part of the city (Fig. 42).  The second 
tornado touched down on the northeast side of the city, just two minutes 
after the first, and moved east. 
KGSP base reflectivity 0.5 degree scan at 0048 UTC on 11 April 2009 KGSP storm relative motion 0.5 degree scan at 0048 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 41.  KGSP base reflectivity (top) and storm relative motion 
(bottom) on the 0.5 degree scan at 0048 UTC on 11 April.  Click on 
images to enlarge.
Track of damage associated with the Greenwood, SC tornadoes on 10 April 2009
Figure 42.  Track of the Greenwood, South Carolina, tornadoes of 
10 April 2009, shown by the solid black lines.  The southern tornado 
touched down first at 0041 UTC and lifted at 0047 UTC on 11 April.  The 
northern tornado touched down second at 0043 UTC and ended at 0045 UTC.  
The map scale is shown in the lower left.  Click on image to enlarge.
f. The Union County, North Carolina, Storm
By 0100 UTC, the transition to a linear convective system was nearly 
complete, suggesting the primary threat for the area downstream was 
damaging winds.
The bow echo remnant of the storm that produced the tornado near 
Jonesville moved south of Charlotte around 0130 UTC.  The KGSP radar 
showed the leading edge of the bow echo entering Union County, North 
Carolina, at 0135 UTC (Fig. 43).  The bow echo appeared to weaken 
through 0148 UTC over the southwestern part of the county.  By 
0151 UTC, the bow echo moved far enough away from the radar that 
storm relative motion data was not available.  Radar data from the
Terminal Doppler Weather Radar located north of the Charlotte - 
Douglas International Airport (the TCLT radar) was contaminated by 
improperly dealiased velocity information and yielded few clues 
about the potential for additional severe weather.  Meanwhile, 
the NWS Doppler radar at the Columbia, South Carolina, airport 
(the KCAE radar) was close enough to have a good view of the 
bow echo as it moved south of Charlotte.  The KCAE radar showed 
evidence of the bow echo remnant to the south of Monroe, North 
Carolina, but did not detect any coherent rotational signature on 
the 0.5 degree scan (Fig. 44).
KGSP base reflectivity four lowest elevation scans at 0130 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 43.  KGSP radar reflectivity at (A) 0.5 degrees, (B) 0.9 degrees, 
(C) 1.3 degrees, and (D) 1.8 degrees from the 0130 UTC volume scan on 
11 April.  Click on image to enlarge.
KCAE base reflectivity 0.5 degree scan at 0149 UTC on 11 April 2009 KCAE storm relative motion 0.5 degree scan at 0149 UTC on 11 April 2009
Figure 44.  KCAE base reflectivity (top) and storm relative motion 
(bottom) on the 0.5 degree scan at 0149 UTC on 11 April.  Click on 
images to enlarge.
The weakened bow echo produced a straight but intermittent path of 
tree, outbuilding, and roof shingle damage about five miles south of 
Monroe.  The damage path was on the order of two miles long and about 
one-quarter mile wide.  However, the majority of the trees were blown 
down in the same general direction.  Damage to structures was on the 
windward side with any debris blown in the direction of storm travel.  
A group of 10 Bradford pear trees lining a driveway were all blown 
down in the same direction and a metal carport behind a house was 
lifted up and blown onto the back deck of the house.  There was some 
evidence here to suggest the trees were on the south side of the 
damage path and blown in a direction that would be convergent with 
the storm track.
The preponderance of radar evidence from KGSP, KCAE, and TCLT suggested 
a bow echo and collapsing updraft/elevated reflectivity core near the 
spot where the damage began.  For that reason, the subjective 
interpretation of the damage was that it was caused by straight-line 
wind and not a tornado.
5.  Concluding Remarks
The tornado outbreak on 10 April 2009 was a challenging event, 
particularly because the nature of the convection transitioned from 
supercellular during the late afternoon, to  quasi-linear convective 
systems (QLCS) during the evening.  The Jonesville and Abbeville 
tornadoes were essentially QLCS tornadoes spawned from a low level 
mesovortex (see Weisman and Trapp 2003  for an overview of mesovortices).  
Atkins and St. Laurent (2009)  found that stronger and potentially more 
damaging mesovortices occurred when low level shear was nearly balanced 
by horizontal vorticity generated by the cold pool, which also resulted 
in upright updrafts. The scientific literature has many examples of 
tornadoes along the edge of bow echoes.  Some studies (especially DeWald 
and Funk 2000 ) have noted tornadogenesis associated with rapid spin-up 
of well-defined cyclonic circulations from transient low-level shear 
zones along and to the north of the apex of a bowing convective line 
segment.  Other authors note the difficulty that similar rapid 
intensification and tornadogenesis imposes on the issuance of effective 
warnings.
References
Atkins, N. T., and M. St. Laurent, 2009:  Bow echo mesovortices.  Part 1:  
     Processes that influence their damaging potential.  Manuscript 
     submitted to Monthly Weather Review for publication.


DeWald, V. L., and T. W. Funk, 2000: WSR-88D reflectivity and velocity 
     trends of a damaging squall line event on 20 April 1996 over south-
     central Indiana and central Kentucky. Preprints, 20th Conf. on 
     Severe Local Storms, Orlando, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 177180.

Weisman, M. L., and R. J. Trapp, 2003:  Low-level mesovortices within 
     squall lines and bow echoes.  Part 1:  Overview and dependence on 
     environmental shear.  Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 2779-2803.
Acknowledgements
The KGSP radar images were created using the Java NEXRAD viewer obtained
from the National Climatic Data Center.  Other KGSP radar views, including
reflectivity cross sections and reflectivity surfaces were created using the
GRlevel2 Analyst software package.  Satellite imagery, radar mosaics, and
surface observation plots were obtained from the RAP Real-Time Weather page
maintained by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research.  Upper
air analyses and mesoscale analyses were obtained from the Storm Prediction
Center.  Upper air sounding plots were created using the RAwinsonde
OBservation (RAOB) Program (version 5.8) for Windows.  The surface analyses were obtained from the Hydrometeorological
Prediction Center.  Tornado track images were created using DeLorme Street
Atlas USA 2009 edition.


Local Climate Water & Weather Topics:
Current Hazards, Current Conditions, Radar, Satellite, Climate, Weather Safety, Contact Us

National Weather Service
Weather Forecast Office Greenville-Spartanburg
GSP International Airport
1549 GSP Drive
Greer, SC 29651
(864) 848-3859
Questions or Comments? Send us email
Page last modified: August 26, 2011

Disclaimer
Information Quality
Credits
Glossary
Privacy Policy
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
About Us
Career Opportunities